Scottish
prisoners are marched to imprisonment after
defeat.
|
The conditions were so bad
the the Military Guards on the ships complained.
Letter (W.O. 4/42 p 185) 14th August 1746.
"Sir, It having been represented to the
Secretary at War that the soldiers of Lord Henry
Beauclerk's Regt. put on board the two transports,
the Liberty & Property and the James and Mary,
to guard the rebell prisoners there, complain
much of the hardships they undergoe in performing
that duty, by being obliged to lye on the deck
without any sort of bedding, and having nothing
to subsist upon, but bread and cheese, with hot
fiery Brandy and water. I am directed by Mr Fox
to desire you would enquire into the Truth of
this matter and favour him with your Opinion how
the inconvenience complained of may be removed,
consistent with the good of his Majestys
Service.
I am Sir, Your most humble servant.
Edw. Lloyd.
This letter was addressed to the Officer
Commanding Tilbury Fort. It was decided that
detachments were to be relieved every forty eight
hours.
Rationing and Care of Prisoners.
Real conditions for the prisoners are not
revealed by the official records. As early as 13th
January 1746, "Secretary Corbett" was
directed to address the "Commissioners for
sick and Wounded" and to instruct them to
undertake the task of caring for the expected
prisoners. (Treasury Board Minutes 1/32 p.81) 14th
January 1746. The Treasury Board met. (T.B.M.29/30
p.230) Read a letter to Mr. Scrope for the sick/wounded
office dated 11th January 1746, about subsisting
Rebell prisoners in England.
My Lords are of the opinion that 4 pence per diem
per man be allowed them and the same be provided
in the best manner".
|
On 20th January the
Commissioners asked for £2000 on account and enquired
what sum it was proposed to allow for sick prisoners.
4th March 1746 (T.B.M. 29/30 p 247) Meeting minutes.
"Commissioners for sick and wounded attend on their
memorial of 25th February last concerning Rebell
prisoners.
My Lords are of the opinion that sick prisoners be
subsisted at or under 12 pence per day as proposed by the
Commissioners; and their Lordships are also of the
opinion that all persons who are or shall be taken
prisoners of war on board Men of War or Transports should
be deemed and treated as prisoners of war until it shall
appear that they are Subjects of Great Britain and
Rebells".
An undated Pamphlet published by the "Commissioners
for taking Care of sick and wounded seamen and for
exchanging Prisoners of War" gives the Official
instructions which it is evident were never followed. It
is subtitled: "Instructions to be observed by the
persons appointed to take care of the Rebel Prisoners etc.
in Great Britain". I give it here in full as an
example of official blindness to the facts and as a
typical 18th Century directive which was
characteristically ignored.
I
"All such Rebels
as are taken prisoners, as well as those taken upon
suspicion of Treason ... are to be secured in the
gaol of the place, in the same manner other criminals for
treason are; and attested lists of the names and
Qualities of such prisoners are to be asked for of the
persons who deliver them and copies thereof transmitted
to us from time to time in Form I.
II
A weekly account of
them is to be sent us in Form No. 2 and the names of such
as shall have been discharged or shall have Died or
Escaped ... set off on the back of it.
III
The prisoners are to
be subsisted by ... according to the annexed scheme
No. 3 and care taken their provisions be properly dressed
for them; That they be furnished with as much good fresh
water as they shall desire, and have a sufficiency of
clean straw to lie on, and that this will be changed
every fortnight, for all of which there will be allowed
Four pence a Man a Day.
IV
The prisoners are
frequently to be mustered, and such checqued out of
subsistence, for the benefit of the Crown, as refuse to
answer their call.
V
If any of the said
prisoners should happen to be either sick or wounded,
they are to be put into some convenient place seperate (Sic)
from the other prisoners, and there furnished with
beds and bedding, Diet and Nursing...for which there will
be allowed Eight pence a Man a Day for as long as their
state of health shall require it.
VI
Some Skilful surgeon
is to be employed to attend the said sick or wounded
prisoners, to furnish them with proper medicaments and to
do everything necessary in the way of his profession for
their cure, for which service they will be allowed six
shillings and eightpence for the cure of each man.
VII
If any of the said
prisoners shall die, a grave is to be dug for them and
they be put into it at the cheapest rate that may be and
the expense charged in the proper column of the book No.
4"
-------------------
Provisions.
The scheme of provisions to be issued each rebel prisoner
every day was to be as follows: '
Wheaten Bread |
one lb. |
Marketable Beef |
half lb. |
Gloucester or other Cheese
equivalent to it |
quarter lb. |
N.B. The meat to be boiled
into broth with oatmeal salt etc." |
|
We should note that though bread is mentioned, no scale
of oatmeal is defined. As the gaoler had to find the
above ration and to make his own profit out of fourpence
a day, it is hardly probable that he troubled much about
the addition of oatmeal or condiment to the broth.
Many of the above provisions sound very hollow in view of
the conditions which really did exist within the Fort and
the Transports. Unfortunately none of the Forms specified
above survive in the State Papers Domestic for English
Prisons. If they had many of the unanswered questions of
the Incident would be cleared up.
To add insult to injury the prisoners at Tilbury became
an entertainment to inquisitive souls. (Culloden. John
Prebble P.249)
"The fort was a
great attraction to Londoners during the late summer and
autumn of 1746. They went down to the marsh banked
estuary by wherries or private boats. From Westminster,
and for sixpence, it was possible to travel on the
Gravesend tiltboat, the Long Ferry which the people of
Gravesend had operated for three and a half centuries
under a charter granted them by Richard II. It was rowed
by five oarsmen, and could take forty passengers who sat
aft under the tilt, a canvas awning. The trip was a jolly
experience, particularly if the weather were fine and
there was a good wind to fill the sail and relieve the
oarsmen. At Tilbury they were brought in close to the
Transports, and they held perfumed handkerchiefs to their
noses. If one had an entree to Captain Cayran or Captain
Massey, it was possible to land and enter the fort across
its tidal moat. Then a walk over the cobbled parade for a
brief but exciting glimpse of the Rebels inside the
powder galleries. Even without such an entree the day
could be made by the sight of the transports, by the
bright scarlet of the sentries on the ramparts, the sun
glinting on steel bayonets, seafowl crying on the
mudflats and the noise of drums rolling. But the real
excitement of the journey, understood or not, was that
enjoyed by a man who can stand so close and yet be so
comfortably far from caged animals".
CASUALTIES .AT TILBURY AND IN THE TRANSPORTS
Records have largely been lost and every writer on the
subject owes a great debt to Seton and Arnot's research
contained in "The prisoners of the '45". Even
so, much must still be conjecture based on evidence
available.
The original convoy which left Inverness bound for
Tilbury consisted of seven ships escorted by H.M.S.
Winchelsea containing 564 prisoners.
The "Jane of Leith" lost 11 out of her 109
prisoners (11%) between the 7th May and the 27th May. The
"Alexander & Mary" lost 13 (5%) in 35 days.
At Tilbury, by the 11th August 1746, 264 prisoners had
been landed and put in the Fort. 82 remained on board the
"Liberty and Property" and James and Mary".
Thus the total number of prisoners had fallen from 564 to
468 in 70 days. [S.P. Dom. 85-122 & 185 36 - 18 &
207]
On the 11th September 1746, the number of prisoners in
the Fort had fallen from 264 to 223, those on the "Pamela"
from 82 to 74 and the total on the other two ships from
136 to 110. Thus the total reduction in the course of the
month from 11th August to 11th September was from 482 to
407 [S.P. Dom. 87-122]
There is then indisputable evidence that of the original
564 prisoners of 3rd July only 407 were shown in the
lists of 11th September including those in Tilbury Fort
and this loss of 157 men or 29-7% in a period of 100 days
accounts no doubt for the numerous blanks in the columns
showing disposal of individuals in the prisoners lists.
That these men, or the vast majority of them, died is the
only possible explanation of the discrepancy". (Seton
and Arnot).
Individuals at Tilbury.
Space precludes full details of those prisoners who are
noted as being at Tilbury from being detailed here. A few
of the more interesting ones will serve as examples. Each
prisoner is given the number which he bears in The
Prisoners of the '45" where fuller details are
available.
No. |
Name |
Prison |
Disposal |
434
|
Stewart Carmichael |
Pamela |
Escaped by saving bladders
from his food, inflating them and swimming to
Kent where he remained until amnesty. |
652 |
James Davidson |
Wallsgrave & Tilbury
Fort |
Released. Age 14 "A
very wicked boy". Turned King's Evidence. |
838 |
Revd. Charles Farquaharson
S.J. |
Tilbury London (Southwark)
|
Released on condition of
departing the kingdom and not returning. A Jesuit
Priest. |
845 |
John Farquharson |
Tilbury London |
Escaped? |
1707 |
Neil M' Aulay |
|
Released. Itinerant tailor.
Still in the Fort April 1747. "Evidence
against Lord Lovat". |
1812 |
Revd. Allan MacDonald |
Tilbury London |
Released 22.5.47 Confessor
to Prince Charles Edward Stuart |
2060 |
Williarn M'Intosh |
Jane of Alloway
TilburyFort |
Died? "Was a baggage
man, a poor object'. |
2068 |
John MIntyre |
Tilbury |
Died? Suspected a
thief |
2425 |
Duncan MRievre |
Tilbury |
Died? For having
rowed the Pretenders son from S Uist to
Skye |
3433 |
John Wilson |
Dolphin Tilbury Fort |
Died? A Boy |
3445 |
Andrew Wood |
Thane of Fife Tilbury
London |
Hanged Drawn and Quartered
Kennington Common 28.11.46 |
This latter unfortunate is
mentioned in a broadsheet in Grays Reference Library
entitled "A Genuine Account of the Lives, behaviour,
confession and Dying words of the eight Scotch Rebels. .
. who were executed on Friday the 28th November
1746 for High Treason at Kennington Common, in Levying
war against his Most Sacred Majesty King George the
Second.
London. Printed by C. Trueman in the Old Baily, 1746".
This strange document gives not only the dying words of
Wood but also of James Lindsay, at one time at Tilbury,
"These speeches, being most excactly taken verbatim
from the mouths of the condemned persons, who spoke them".
Wood's speech was probably written for him as Lindsay and
two others were in fact reprieved and never suffered. No
doubt they treasured their dying words for a long time!
One can hardly leave the prisoners of Tilbury without a
thought for Alexander Buchanan of the Jane of Leith, who
was taken to London, tried, "Acquitted, but
transported by mistake".
Conclusions.
This article begs many questions and much is still
obscure. The Parish records of Thurrock seem to record
nothing of the period. West Tilbury church records have a
gap between April 12th 1745 and October 1749. There are
no records available for burials at the Fort. The Barrett-Lennard
papers bear no reference to the incident, but surely
someone, somewhere, in the area must have made some
reference to the affair?
There remains also the problem of the graves. Nowhere at
Tilbury Fort is there any sign of a Military Cemetery for
the use of the Fort, let alone of graves for the
prisoners. No map shows a grave yard but it must be there
somewhere, for many soldiers must have died there over
the years. The prisoners were no doubt buried in large
pits by the other prisoners because of the typhus. It
would be interesting to locate these if possible, and
also the official cemetery. It is quite possible that
prisoners dying on board the transports were thrown into
the water.
Does anyone know of a map of the Fort showing the
whereabouts of the graves? Does anyone know of any other
local reference to this incident which is not even
mentioned in the official Guide to the fort?
Acknowledgements
Martin Secker and Warburg, the publishers, and Mr. John
Prebble, the author, kindly gave permission for the use
of the quotation from "Culloden", the best
general book on the story of the battle and its aftermath.
The material from "The Prisoners of The 45" by
Sir Bruce Gordon Seton and Jean Gordon Arnot was used by
courtesy of the Council of the Scottish History Society.
Other works consulted, apart from
those mentioned in the text, were:
Jacobite Gleanings, B J.Macbeth Forbes.
The Lyon in Mourning, by Robert Forbes and Rev. Henry
Paton.
My thanks are also due to Roger and
Eileen Saunders who started all this, to Pat Harries who
checked my French translation, to Randal Bingley for much
help and guidance, and to the staff of Thurrock Reference
Library.
Previous page
|